Insights

This month's feature article comes from our intellectual property team: Removal of trade mark granted on the basis of "non-use" (even if mark is in use): Lodestar Anstalt v Campari America. Also this month we bring you articles on retention of title as a security interest, corporate advisory, construction and engineering, property law, energy and resources, and commercial litigation.

We welcome all media enquiries and feedback about our articles, as well as any suggestions you may have for topics you would like to see covered in future editions.

Until next month,
 

Dan Brush                     
Special Counsel               
  

Property

Real estate agents' obligations affected by legislative changes
Foreign resident capital gains withholding regime
Relocation and demolition clauses: how small business traders can minimise disruption
  

Construction and engineering

Adjudication determinations - a new era in challenges?
 

Energy and resources

Nuclear power under consideration by South Australian government
  

Corporate advisory

New tax incentives for start-up investors
 

Restructuring and insolvency

Retention of title as a security interest under the Personal Property Securities Act
  

Commercial litigation

Open Courts Act 2013 (Vic) and suppression orders
 

Intellectual property

Removal of trade mark granted on the basis of "non-use" (even if mark is in use): Lodestar Anstalt v Campari America
 
 
 

This article has been published by Colin Biggers & Paisley for information and education purposes only and is a general summary of the topic(s) presented. This article is not specific legal advice. Please seek your own legal advice for any questions you may have. All information contained in this article is subject to change. Colin Biggers & Paisley cannot be held responsible for any liability whatsoever, or for any loss howsoever arising from any reliance upon the contents of this article.​

Related Articles