In brief - Councils' power to ignore a private covenant may be good news for property developers in New South Wales
Planning legislation has for some time allowed for development to be conducted which may not necessarily comply with private covenants and restrictions on use.
Section 3.16 (2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (Act) provides the following:
For the purpose of enabling development to be carried out in accordance with an environmental planning instrument or in accordance with a consent granted under this Act, an environmental planning instrument may provide that, to the extent necessary to serve that purpose, a regulatory instrument specified in that environmental planning instrument shall not apply to any such development or shall apply subject to the modifications specified in that environmental planning instrument.
A regulatory instrument means any Act (other than the Act), rule, regulation, by-law, ordinance, proclamation, agreement, covenant or instrument by or under whatever authority made.
An example of a recently overridden instrument was a restriction on use contained in a section 88B Instrument setting a minimum residential build size for various sized blocks of land.
The restriction provided for a minimum build of 160 square metres, but the owner entered into an agreement for a proposed house size of 158 square metres.
The builder procured a Complying Development Certificate (CDC) for the proposed smaller sized house. A CDC is a "consent granted under this Act" for the purposes of 3.16 (2).
The relevant environmental planning instrument for the site, State Environment Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006 Liverpool Growth Centres Precinct Plan, specified -
For the purpose of enabling development on land in any zone to be carried out in accordance with this Precinct Plan or with a consent granted under the Act, any agreement, covenant or other similar instrument that restricts the carrying out of that development does not apply to the extent necessary to serve that purpose.
Accordingly, the restriction on use did not apply.
This is a timely reminder that, through planning legislation, many consent authorities wish to maintain ultimate control over development concerns without being hamstrung by private covenants.
These policies vary from council to council and precinct to precinct so careful consideration should be given to the applicable environmental planning instrument applying to the site.
This article has been published by Colin Biggers & Paisley for information and education purposes only and is a general summary of the topic(s) presented. This article is not specific legal or financial advice. Please seek your own legal or financial advice for any questions you may have. All information contained in this article is subject to change. Colin Biggers & Paisley cannot be held responsible for any liability whatsoever, or for any loss howsoever arising from any reliance upon the contents of this article.