A submitter appeal against the approval of a development application for a development permit for a material change of use for bulky goods sales is allowed based, among other things, on the lack of demonstrated need for the proposed development.
An appeal to against a local government's decision to categorise land as "2T Residential 2" has been dismissed.
An application to change a development approval given by a judgment of the Planning and Environment Court of Queensland is required to name as a respondent each party to the original judgment.
Five appeals are dismissed in respect of the refusal of five development applications for development permits for a material change of use for a dual occupancy use.
The High Court has now clarified that the proportionate liability regime is available in arbitration (Tesseract International Pty Ltd v Pascale Construction Pty Ltd [2024] HCA 24 (Tesseract)).
At Colin Biggers & Paisley, we are dedicated to active community participation and strong leadership guided by our core values of loyalty, respect, integrity, and balance.
![High Court clarifies that proportionate liability regimes apply in arbitrations: Tesseract International Pty Ltd v Pascale Construction Pty Ltd [2024]](/getmedia/94131867-7e40-452e-a8ef-9b5b5bd3b336/construction.jpg?width=1667&height=1667&mediaprotectionhash=c9ef3812ad1f76339438a5fef83e6060837d1f82e725c0cab58d350d7fbd5c8f&ext=.jpg)
