PUBLICATIONS circle 29 Aug 2025

CBP Focus | August 2025

Welcome to the August 2025 edition of CBP Focus, where our lawyers share key insights from across the practice.


In this edition, our feature article, When AI meets IP: The Disney and Universal v Midjourney Caseexamines a landmark legal dispute between major entertainment companies and an AI platform, highlighting the evolving intersection of intellectual property law and artificial intelligence.

We trust you will find this edition of CBP Focus informative. As always, please contact our authors with any questions.

Construction & Engineering

Absolute discretion, good faith and sunset-style clauses: County Court decision in LVL Transport v Fuller Road [2025] VCC 419

The County Court of Victoria has recently handed down an important decision clarifying the scope of contractual obligations under a contract of sale, the limits of implied good faith and the dangers of “absolute discretion” clauses. The case is a timely reminder for developers and purchasers alike that courts will construe commercial contracts to give effect to businesslike outcomes and unilateral powers to cancel, or delay may be scrutinised.

Read more

Corporate & Commercial

Statutory unconscionability: What businesses need to know (intellectual fairy floss not included)

The Full Court of the Federal Court has clarified that statutory unconscionability under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) is determined by statutory factors, rather than broad “community standards.” This followed an appeal by Mercedes-Benz dealers challenging the brand’s shift to a sales agency model, which the Court dismissed.

Read more

Digital Governance, Cyber and Privacy

Digital Governance, Cyber and Privacy Quarterly Roundup August 2025

The twelfth edition of our quarterly Digital Governance, Cyber and Privacy newsletter explores the latest developments in regulatory expectations and legal responses to cyber risk, AI adoption and data governance.

Read more

Insurance

Key takeaways from a recent QCAT decision on the disqualification of a psychologist

A recent QCAT decision addresses the appropriate length of disqualification for a psychologist convicted of misconduct, focusing on balancing sentencing principles, delays in proceedings, and protecting public trust in the profession.

Read more

Intellectual Property

When AI Meets IP: The Disney and Universal v Midjourney Case

Disney and Universal are suing MidJourney over AI-generated images. The dispute raises complex questions around how AI models process copyrighted content, whether user prompts that replicate existing works could constitute infringement, and the broader implications for creators and AI service providers globally.

Read more

This is commentary published by Colin Biggers & Paisley for general information purposes only. This should not be relied on as specific advice. You should seek your own legal and other advice for any question, or for any specific situation or proposal, before making any final decision. The content also is subject to change. A person listed may not be admitted as a lawyer in all States and Territories. Colin Biggers & Paisley, Australia 2025

Stay connected

Connect with us to receive our latest insights.