A recent Court of Appeal decision clarifies the duty of care schools owe during sporting events, confirming that while some risk is inherent, schools must take reasonable steps to prevent harm. Where simple measures can improve safety, the legal obligation to act becomes clear, reinforcing student protection standards.
The Queensland Industrial Relations Commission (QIRC) in Satterly v Brisbane City Council [2025] QIRC 97 examines establishing workplace misconduct as a valid dismissal reason, especially when psychiatric injury is involved. It highlights how misconduct and unfair dismissal interact with the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003.
The High Court confirmed that prior settlements in historical abuse claims can be set aside without proof that legal barriers directly influenced the agreement, broadening the “just and reasonable” test and limiting the finality of past deeds.
Recent accusations of recipe plagiarism against a famous food influencer have sparked discussions about the role of copyright law in something as commonplace as a recipe. Below, we explore whether recipes attract copyright protection, what may constitute copyright infringement, and how creators can protect their treasured intellectual property.
Shaping Property in 2025: Navigating the Known Unknowns
The UK Court of Appeal upheld that a school was not vicariously liable for abuse committed by an 18-year-old on a work experience placement, finding that his limited role lacked a close connection to the school’s functions. The ruling underscores the strict limits of vicarious liability where no employment-like relationship exists.
.jpg?width=2121&height=1414&mediaprotectionhash=296f63f1bf3c2d30b8ba8d9b975abd79990d226874e485a08a149d8f851f496b&ext=.jpg)
